I have already made one change for 2008, this in my TV viewing.
The Comcast recorder keeps lists of "favorites," groupings of channels you enjoy. There can be a max of five such lists, each including many channels.
The change I have made is deleting the big list called "news" and creating a new pne called "nature." Into this latter I have put Discovery, National Geographic, Science and the like. Animal Planet, etc.
I think I am just fed up with "the news!." Fed up enough that I don't want to try to write about why now. But it isn't just the stories, it also is the quality of the coverage.
So, I would prefer to watch "Christmas in Yellowstone" (a recently-shown documentary) than see Pakistan teeter on the brink. Brink of what? This is a nuclear power we are talking about, where civil order and the hope of democratic government seems (from this great distance) to be disappearing. How much do I want to know about that? Especially given my certainty that the Bush administration and his State Department will not be able to deal with this new crisis helpfully, any more than the have the many others in the past.
More important to me now is--knowing how DO the grizzly bears make it through the winter? And are there other animals that hibernate? (Which I guess I wouldn't mind doing myself!)
For too long I was involved in government to easily give up paying attention to elections, to presidential statements and misdeeds, to budget and taxation, war progress or lack thereof; to notice the degree attention to important public problems (or how they are ignored) and to the various policy proposals to address them, however well or poorly. I can't give that all up yet, not totally.
But I don't need as big a "video diet" of it as I've been getting! There is nothing much I can do about it all anyhow, and it must raise my blood pressure some.
Instead, like Walt Whitman, perhaps I am better off to "turn and live with animals, they are so placid and self-contained."
Or, if not that, to change the channel at least!