I am enthusiastically waiting for the opening of the movie 10,000 BC, which is to be on March 7th. Just a week. But I am also curious to see to what extent the movie mirrors known facts or best guesses about human physical and social development.
A fact that I have long carried in my head is that the origin of agriculture was
about 10,000 years ago. I guess 10,000 years BC (as in the movie's title) would be about 12,000 years ago.
So a movie with the title 10,000 BC really shouldn't show much in the way of extensive farming. And without farming there can be no major settlements,
no cities. And without cities there can be no state, no real ruling class. Anyhow, that is my understanding.
But the film's previews and publicity stills seem to show a lot more than rudimentary urban development. So, I guess that is an "error." Still might be a good movie, though.
A show I watched recently on the National Geographic Channel suggested that the "first man," the single male from which all contemporary males are descended, lived about 50,000 years ago (in what is now Kenya). So that is the beginning of getting a time scale:
--us (complete with blogging capabilities!)
--Christ, about 2000 years ago
--agriculture invented, 10,000 years ago
--male of origin, 50,000 years ago.